Will Theocracy Work In The Philippines

Will Theocracy Work In The Philippines

Will theocracy work in the philippines

Daftar Isi

1. Will theocracy work in the philippines


In the past,yes it works as the Spanish colonial government in the 16th century to 19th century was de facto ruled by the Roman Catholic Church while the Colonial Government itself is coexist as the church and the state mixed up that's why theocratic rule or frailocracy in the Philippines works.

In the present day, it's a bigger No or nearly impossible because the current Constitution enforce the separation of the Church and the State that no one violates this separation.


2. will theocracy work in the phillipines​


Theocracy will not work in the Philippines in the current time. Explanation: Theocracy is a form of government in which God or some god, who is controlled day to day by day by government, is regarded as ultimate governing authority.Theocracy will never work in Philippines. Explanation: Theocracy is a government being ruled by religious leaders and uses the power of Gods. We have lots of religions and beliefs here in Philippines and it’s really hard for the people to unite.

3. will theocracy work jn the phillipines​


Answer:

In the past,yes it works as the Spanish colonial government in the 16th century to 19th century was de facto ruled by the Roman Catholic Church while the Colonial Government itself is coexist as the church and the state mixed up that's why theocratic rule or frailocracy in the Philippines works.

In the present day, it's a bigger No or nearly impossible because the current Constitution enforce the separation of the Church and the State that no one violates this separation.


4. Malaysia is a monarchy,autocracy,federal state or theocracy?​


Answer:

USA

Explanation:

download brainly for nothing


5. Gaano kahalaga sa Sumerian ang theocracy?​


Answer:

Dahil ang mga sumerian ay mas naniniwala sa mga teorya at hindi sa pamamahala na idinudulot ng isang lider na namamahala sa kanila. Base ito sa kanilang kinagisnang kultura at tradisyon

Explanation:

sana maka help


6. iba pang detalye tungkol sa theocracy


Answer:

Isang Sistema ng gobyerno na kung saan pinamumunuan ito ng isang priest gamit ang pangalang ng God or god

Explanation:


7. bakit theocracy ang pamahalaang sinusunod ng mga Sumerian


Answer:

Dahil ang mga sumerian ay mas naniniwala sa mga teorya at hindi sa pamamahala na idinudulot ng isang lider na namamahala sa kanila. Base ito sa kanilang kinagisnang kultura at tradisyon.


8. disadvantages of theocracy


List of the Disadvantages of Theocracy

1. Alternative opinions are rarely welcomed in a theocracy.

When someone reads a book, their individual perspectives will guide the interpretation of the material they encounter.

2. Theocracies might preach peace, but they teach discord.

When you question the government’s actions or policies when living in a theocracy, then most leaders would equate that action to questioning God, the gods in charge, or even the ruler who society sees as a god.

3. Minority groups are not tolerated in theocracies.

When you are living in a theocracy, then being in the minority on anything is not a position where you want to be.

4. Businesses must operate under the guise of the theocratic law.

Saudi Arabia is a kingdom where the country and God’s Book and the Sunnah of His Prophet are the federal constitution.

5. You cannot have a unique faith under the structure of a theocracy.

Although some theocracies may suggest that you can believe anything you want if you are willing to follow the structure of the law, the foundational scriptural elements of the government would suggest otherwise.

6. Theocracies change the fundamental beliefs of a nation.

Theocracies have the power to change the structure of a religion as they see fit based on the political needs of the moments.

7. The structure of a democracy is based on selfish ambition.

If you think about the usual pitch that someone makes about joining a specific faith, the goal is to encourage someone to take on a form of spiritual life insurance.

8. It places the cultural expectations of one society against others.

Because there is such a lack of cooperation that develops under the context of a theocracy, international trade opportunities become limited since there is a need to build relationships with like-minded governments.

9. Facts don’t matter when you are living in a theocracy.

Even though it seems like there would be benefits to living in a theocracy, most people find that it is challenging to maintain their household because there are fewer facts available.

10. Theocracies are temporary.

The problem that human societies eventually have with religion is that the belief systems of a group change.


9. 1. What do you think of the concept of leadership of Filipinos in general? Defend your answer. 2. Will Theocracy work in the Philippines? 3. Will a government following the ideology of communism or anarchy work in our country? Why or why not? 4. What could be the best type of government for the Philippines? Justify your answer. 5. Imagine you were asked to create a new form of government that could effectively address the concerns of governance in the country; what kind of government it would be?


Answer:

piglet

Explanation:


10. kahulugan ng theocracy


Isang anyo ng pamamahala o gobyerno kung saan ang mga lider ng relihiyon ang siya ring namumuno sa bansa.


11. what is the meaning of theocracy


government of a state by immediate divine guidance or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided

12. iba pang detalye tungkol sa theocracy


Answer:

: government of a state by immediate divine guidance or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided

2: a state governed by a theocracy

Explanation:


13. Who wanted to overthrow roman empire and establish a theocracy?


Question :

Who wanted to overthrow roman empire and establish a theocracy?

Answer :

Gaius Julius Caesar

14. Ano ang kahalagahan ng theocracy?


Ang kahalagahan ng THEOCRACY ---> ito ay isang uri ng pamahalaan (government) na kung saan pinamumunuan ng isang relihiyosong awtoridad.

15. What are the ill effects of “theocracy” & “conservatism


Answer:

A theocracy is a merging of theological (belief in God) religious faith and governance. More specifically, it is a government whereby all laws and dictates are established by religious laws, invoking the ruling authority of God or of gods. An example of a theocracy in modern times is 'Sharia Law’. To the non-religious non-believer, this is simply writing laws using fictional authorities as the basis of enforcement.

Whereas, conservatism is a term, juxtaposed with the term 'liberalism’, that means (my definition) “to carefully weigh one's actions to preserve the well-being of the whole based on established knowledge, rather than (as with liberalism) acting on potentially specious ideals of unproven strategies for the pursuit of gratifying desires.”

This does not in itself have anything at all whatsoever to do with religion nor politics. Conservatism in an immediate financial decision, for example, would mean to avoid wasteful spending. A conservative person with regard to money would save money, whereas a very liberal person would gamble it off or make extremely high risk investments. From an ethical standpoint, there are times when being liberal is ideal and appropriate; it's good to be a liberal giver of your own money, for example, to those in need, so long as it is your own money.

Explanation:

hope it helps u bb :)


16. ano ang ibig sabihin ng theocracy


Ang theocracy o teokrasya ay isang konsepto sa politika na tumutukoy sa isang uri ng pamamahala kung saan ang mga pinuno ay namumuno sa ngalan ng kinikilala nilang diyos.

 

Nagmula ang salita sa salitang  Griyego na theos o diyos at krateo o mamahala. Ilan sa mga bansang sumailalim sa teokrasya ay ang mga sumusunod:

 

1.    Israel

2.    Geneva at Zurich

3.    Persia


17. kahulugan ng theocracy​


Answer:

Theocracy, government by divine guidance or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided. In many theocracies, government leaders are members of the clergy, and the state's legal system is based on religious law.

Explanation:

pabrainly

Answer:

Ang isang teokrasya ay isang pamahalaan na pinamamahalaan sa ilalim ng banal na tuntunin o ang pagkukunwaring banal na tuntunin. Ang pinagmulan ng salitang "teokrasya" ay mula sa ika-17 siglo mula sa salitang Griyego na "theokratia." Ang "Theo" ay Griyego para sa Diyos, at ang "cracy" ay nangangahulugang pamahalaan.


18. What are the efforts of “theocracy” and conservatism?


Answer:

Theocracy can be detrimental to the people who do not align with the state's official beliefs. It can be used as a tool or excuse to exterminate or oppress a minority religion. Ultra Conservatism on the other hand suppresses innovation making it harder to progress forward for a country adopting this kind of ideology.

Explanation:

hope it helps


19. what are the ill effects of theocracy and conservatism?​


The ill effects of theocracy can be detrimental to the people who do not align with the state's official beliefs. It can be used as a tool or excuse to exterminate or oppress a minority religion.

Ultra Conservatism on the other hand suppresses innovation making it harder to progress forward for a country adopting this kind of ideology.


20. anong pamahalaan ang uri ng Theocracy​


Answer:

pamahalaan kung saan Ang mga tao na Ang may kalayaan na magdikta kung Sino Ang magiging pinuno.

Explanation:

SANA PO MAKATULONG


21. ano pang ibang detalye tungkol sa THEOCRACY


the commonwealth of Israel from the time of Moses until the election of Saul as King

22. halimbawa ng theocracy?


An ecclesiocracy is a situation where the religious leaders assume a leading role in the state, but do not claim that they are instruments of divine revelation: for example, the prince-bishops of the European Middle Ages, where the bishop was also the temporal ruler.

23. Ano ang kahulugan ng theocracy?


anyo ng pamahalaan kung saan ang isang bansa ay pinasiyahan ng mga lider ng relihiyon
: isang bansa na pinamahalaan ng mga lider ng relihiyon

24. Ano ang kahulugan ng theocracy?


anyo ng pamahalaan kung saan ang isang bansa ay pinasiyahan ng mga lider ng relihiyon
: isang bansa na pinamahalaan ng mga lider ng relihiyon

25. Israelite theocracy​


answer

What is a theocracy? Describe Israel's theocracy.

1. A government ruled in the name of God by

religious leaders.

step to step explanationanswer

The term theocracy derives from the Koine Greek θεοκρατία, "rule of God", a term used by Josephus for the kingdoms of Israel and Judah, reflecting the view that "God himself is recognized as the head" of the state.


26. Ano ang kahulugan ng theocracy


Ang teokrasya ay isang anyo ng organisasyon o pamahalaan kung saan ang opisyal na patakaran ay umaayon sa doktrina o teolohiya ng isang partikular na sekta o relihiyon. Ang mga kapangyarihan o autoridad nito ay kinabibilangan ng Supreme Leader of Iran, Dalai Lama, papa, pari o mga pangkat gaya ng Taliban. Ito ay maaari ring tumukoy sa sinumang mga opisyal na nagpahayag na hinirang sila ng Diyos upang maging pinuno. Maaari rin itong katawagan para sa nasyon o bansang nasa ilalim ng sistemang teokrasya. Tinatawag na teokrato o teokratiko ang pinuno sa sistemang teokrasya o tawag din para sa taong naniniwala sa teokrasya.


Theocracy is a form of government in which a deity is the source from which all authority derives.


a system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god.


27. what are the efforts of theocracy and conservatism?


Answer:

It is highly unlikely you could get a particularly objective answer to this question, since everyone will be biased in their opinions, including myself. But, having said that, and believing personally that my opinion is based on education and knowledge of truth, I'll have a go.

To answer this question you have to define these terms. A theocracy is a merging of theological (belief in God) religious faith and governance. More specifically, it is a government whereby all laws and dictates are established by religious laws, invoking the ruling authority of God or of gods. An example of a theocracy in modern times is 'Sharia Law’. To the non-religious non-believer, this is simply writing laws using fictional authorities as the basis of enforcement.

Answer:

Theocracy can be detrimental to the people who do not align with the state's official beliefs. It can be used as a tool or excuse to exterminate or oppress a minority religion. Ultra Conservatism on the other hand suppresses innovation making it harder to progress forward for a country adopting this kind of ideology.

Explanation:


28. What is the difference between 'Theocracy and Monarchy?'


Answer:

The main difference between Monarchy and Theocracy is that the Monarchy is a system of government where the head of state position is inherited within family and Theocracy is a form of government with religious leaders


29. How does Gideon's decision uphold the Israelite theocracy? ​


Answer:I THINK GIDEON REFUSE TO BE KING OF THE PEOPLE BECAUSE HE WANTS GOD TO BE THEIR KING.

Explanation:

I HOPE IT HELPS

BRAINLIEST PO


30. What are the ill effects of "theocracy" and "conservation"?


What are the ill effects of "theocracy" and "conservatism"?

It is highly unlikely you could get a particularly objective answer to this question, since everyone will be biased in their opinions, including myself. But, having said that, and believing personally that my opinion is based on education and knowledge of truth, I'll have a go.

To answer this question you have to define these terms. A theocracy is a merging of theological (belief in God) religious faith and governance. More specifically, it is a government whereby all laws and dictates are established by religious laws, invoking the ruling authority of God or of gods. An example of a theocracy in modern times is 'Sharia Law’. To the non-religious non-believer, this is simply writing laws using fictional authorities as the basis of enforcement.

Whereas, conservatism is a term, juxtaposed with the term 'liberalism’, that means (my definition) “to carefully weigh one's actions to preserve the well-being of the whole based on established knowledge, rather than (as with liberalism) acting on potentially specious ideals of unproven strategies for the pursuit of gratifying desires.”


Video Terkait

Kategori english